#ASIC RATING IN GPU Z SERIES#
But than again the HD7000 series actually follow the ASIC quality "rules." IE the hotter card was the lower quality chips and ran better on water with a higher OC, higher asic cards ran cooler and oced good on air but not better than the lower ASIC cards on water.Įither ways tho i wouldn't put that much stock into it. Yeah the odder ones seem to be from the GTX 600 series and AMD's HD7000 series. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Yeah, I've seen those odd examples as well. Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Mobius 1, Mar 6, 2012. Go to OCN and check the GTX 780 owners thread and you'll notice most of the higher ASIC quality cards are able to get 1200 + on core stable in game and benchmark programs and also get higher voltage. The 66% ran cooler, could only do 1.182v, and did 1032 and could only do 1130 stable. GPU-Z v0.5.9 Sapphire 7950 OC ASIC 73.5 1260 MHz GPU - Benchmark Stable 1790 MHz Memory - Benchmark Stable 1.26v 24/7 stable clocks 1200 MHz GPU - Stable 1750 MHz Memory - Stable 1. A card that uses less power and less voltage to achieve standard design clocks has a higher quality asic. This is based on what clocks are achieved with how much power and how much voltage. However for my Titan's the 79% ASIC card ran hotter, could do 1.2v and did 1059 out of the box and around 1150 stable. Asic quality is a number of standards set to determine how close to its design a card is performing. Most of the time I would say not to worry about ASIC as you'll see some odd examples, but a good amount of times this is true. Higher ASIC numbers produce better overclocking cards on AIR that use less voltage. I have an msi rx 5700 xt gaming x and I heard that the ASIC quality scanning feature is not enabled on rencent gpus. I have a GTX 470 and it is not compatible with the ASIC testing but i think it works with the rendering test. Just downloaded gpu-z and wanted to check my ASIC quality but can't find where. There is a little 3d rendering program included in GPU-Z now that will all detect the exact PCI speed rating. I think it works using the voltage sensors under load. Software will be tough to do that.ASIC quality is NOT useless. This ASIC test is a new feature in GPU-Z. I dont know exactly how its measured but I think GPUZ gets some raw values. In short I think the factory uses electrical measuring instruments to determine the exact ASIC of each GPU for binning. GPU-Zs dev changes the 'ASIC quality' measure scaling from time to time so it doesnt gets to 120 or weird values. The card performs well and has a GPUZ ASIC rating of 91.6. So if anyone has any tips on increasing voltage, please share. Unfortunatley, MSI Afterburner doesnt support voltage adjustment on this card. Only problem is, voltage is capped at 1.13v. A high quality sensitive meter determines the ASIC of each gpu. I installed the XFX 7950 TDJC yesterday and was able to adjust voltage using Trixx. I think the way the factory bins the gpus is they probably have a very fine high quality voltage input on 1 conductive point in the GPU and complete the circuit through the gpu on another exit contace point.
#ASIC RATING IN GPU Z SOFTWARE#
Since it is software controlled by predetermined voltage values the scores are probably going to be off and some gpu materials may cause odd voltage readings that the software isn't programmed to calculate. It is known that there is a variance within an IC device, and if the difference between the leakage of all the transistors is large enough, the Vcc of the whole device must be binned to a higher level, to maintain operational status. I'm thinking that the program creates a load on the chip that has a value of voltage and based on how close the voltage sensor is to reference load voltage a calculation is used to measure the ASIC score. The problem may be that the program was designed to work with a few chips for reference and every chip is probably unique and the reference values are not accurate. It measure the conductive quality of the GPU.